I want to voice my strong opposition to the proposed moratorium on legitimately purchased expansions of State Vehicle Recreation Areas that the Assembly State Budget Committee included in the context of recalibrating fuel tax money transferred into the Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Trust Fund. See: https://carnegiejournal.com/2014/05/27/last-minute-attack-on-the-alamedatesla-expansion-by-the-budget-committee/

Someone is sneaking a reallocation of fuel taxes and a moratorium on off-highway vehicle (OHV) recreation into a budget proposal rather than introducing these provisions in the regular BILL process thereby hoping to avoiding debate. The proposed moratorium is not warranted by any possible future reallocation of fuel taxes because the Alameda/Tesla Expansion has already been purchased and allocated for off road use.

Fuel taxes for fuel used off road, registration fees and use taxes are transferred into the OHV Trust Fund which is used to purchase and maintain State Off-Highway Vehicular Areas (SVRAs), including Carnegie SVRA and the Alameda/Tesla Expansion. The Alameda/Tesla Expansion (specifically targeted by the moratorium) was purchased with OHV Trust Fund money and appropriated for off-highway vehicle recreation by the legislature.

The stated reason for reallocation of fuel taxes is that there is a surplus in the OHV Trust Fund. This excuse ignores the fact that only fuel used for off-highway recreation and off highway access to non-OHV recreation is transferred into the OHV Trust Fund. The share of fuel tax money for OHV is carefully calibrated as directed by state law. What is not mentioned is that much of the surplus was created by last year’s budget when the legislature put a cap on money devoted to grants and cooperative agreements.

Fuel tax is collected at the refinery level and the majority of it is transferred into the Roads and Highway Trust Fund where most of the fuel is used. Relatively small amounts are transferred into other special funds like the Boats and Waterways Revolving Fund, the Aeronautics Account, Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, and the OHV Trust Fund. Quibbling over the exact amount transferred into the OHV trust fund is just an excuse for the moratorium which would effectively prevent the Alameda/Tesla Expansion from opening for OHV use.

The Division of OHV Recreation is in the process of drawing up a general plan incorporating public input and utilizing the best practices as set out in the Code to balance off road recreation with conservation and resource management for the Alameda/Tesla Expansion. The moratorium would defeat the general plan. A provision slipped into the state budget cannot overturn the process of adopting a general plan which is mandated by a procedure totally controlled by state law.

The adoption of a general plan precedes the implementation of an environmental impact statement. In effect, the moratorium prevents an Environmental Impact Statement from being reviewed by the public and then adopted by the Division of OHV Recreation.

Again, any intent to recalibrate the amount of fuel tax transferred to the OHV Trust Fund does not affect property already legitimately purchased and appropriated for OHV use. It is a retroactive and illegal maneuver to try and stop the ongoing planning process leading to the adoption of an of an Environmental Impact Statement and the opening of the Alameda/Tesla Expansion by the Division.

I strongly oppose this reallocation of fuel tax and related moratorium and I feel that they are punitive actions targeted ONLY against OHV recreation.

This entry was posted in Carnegie. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Dave Duffin says:

    Thank God there is a dedicated corps of observers like the author who constantly are on guard duty to make sure our rights are not trampled by the selfish fools who believe we will all “just go away”.

  2. Diana says:

    I submitted my comments to Governor Brown and my two representatives. How about you? We have to make our voices heard over the avalanche of anti OHV comments.

  3. Diana says:

    “Government has grown inaccessible, insulated and out of touch. California’s 120 full time lawmakers propose an average of 5,000 new laws each session affecting the state’s 38 Million residents.Yet the legislature does not produce transcripts or minutes of its hearings.

    The public is left in the dark about decisions being made on its behalf. Only static before and after snapshots are produced; the print version of a bill, the committee analyses, and the final votes. Understanding how or why decisions are being made and when financial relationships may have influenced outcomes is another matter. For these reasons, U.S. Public Interest Research Group ranks California as the worst state for government transparency.”

    The Institute for advanced Technology and Public Policy is working on a new technology platform call Digital Technology.

    “Digital Technology will deliver a fist of its kind searchable video portal of California’s legislative hearings. It unlocks and makes accessible the discussions and interactions between lobbyists and legislators during committee hearings. It also highlights key campaign contribution data, allowing monetary exchanges to be tracked as legislation is crafted and voted on.” See: http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/openforum/article/Technology-disrupts-the-political-status-quo-5571177.php

    I would love to know who is behind the moratorium on the opening of the Alameda/Tesla Expansion in a budget proposal (of all places). Maybe technology can bring back Abraham Lincoln’s vision of “government of the people, by the people and for the people”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s